Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
All submissions must meet the following requirements.
- Manuscripts should be no more than 7,500 words and should conform to current MLA guidelines for format and documentation; they should be free of authors' names and all other identifying references, including institutional affiliation.
- Submissions should be uploaded in digital format. Upload manuscript as an attachment (.doc, .docx, or .rtf format), with all metadata (i.e., embedded identifying information) removed from the file. Also, be sure to remove all "track changes" features from throughout the manuscript.
- Composition Studies will not consider previously published manuscripts or conference papers that have not been revised and extended for a critical reading audience.
- If you have images to accompany your article, please upload the images as separate, supplementary files rather than embedding them in the document. Images must be 300dpi, and can have a maximum width of 4.5 inches and maximum height of 7.5 inches.
Those wishing to submit course designs should first review the Course Designs submission instructions.
Course Designs
Each issue of Composition Studies includes Course Designs, a unique feature for writing/rhetoric faculty at all post-secondary and graduate institutions. Course Designs presents a complete writing or rhetoric course—from its theoretical assumptions and syllabus to a post-course analysis of strengths and limitations. A course design should reflect particularly innovative goals, structure, or approach.
Information about Submitting a Course Design
A published course design includes, in this order:
- A course description that briefly outlines the course.
- A description of theinstitutional context in which the author briefly explains the relationship between the course and/or its specific design and the needs, desires, or focus of the program, department, institution, or community in which the course is offered.
- A theoretical rationale, written specifically for journal readers, that explains the course’s theoretical frame. Together with the critical reflection that follows, this section is the heart of the course design.
- A critical reflection on the design in which the author assesses strengths and acknowledges weaknesses, reflecting on what s/he and the students learned and why.
- A syllabus, preferably the same document distributed to students.
Purpose: As writing/rhetoric instructors, most of us are notorious “borrowers”; indeed, we often complain that we lack sufficient opportunities to exchange the successful activities and approaches we’ve developed through years in the classroom.
Course Designs addresses this need in a concrete way that nevertheless acknowledges the difficulty of transplanting a specific design into another instructor’s classroom, given the range of experience, teaching personae, pedagogies, material circumstances, etc. of our readers. Thus, rather than supply a package of materials for readers to simply reproduce in class next semester, the primary purpose of Course Designs is to inspire, to provoke reflection, to offer new approaches, to challenge prevailing assumptions, to suggest possibilities.
Criteria: Given the above purpose, the editor will evaluate each course design submission according to how well it
- moves beyond “what I did in my class last semester” to examine what students and their teacher learned and why
- theorizes the content of the course as well as the pedagogical approach—that is, the ends and means of the writing instruction being presented
- adds to/complicates/calls into question commonly held ideas about teaching writing
- connects to a larger concern or chronic dilemma in the field of writing studies/rhetoric
Book Reviews
Since 2004, the full text versions of Composition Studies Book Reviews have been available online. Book Reviews not included in our print issues appear as Online Exclusives. Browse the archives.
Interested in reviewing for Composition Studies? Book Review assignments are made from a file of potential reviewers. To have your name added to the file, send a current vita to Bryna Siegel Finer, the Book Review editor. (Requests to review particular books will not be honored.)
Copyright Notice
The Author grants to the publisher, Composition Studies, a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, and use the Work in any form, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Work in an issue of the journal (print or Web), copy and distribute individual reprints of the Work, authorize reproduction of the entire Work in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Work or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Work, and all rights not expressly granted in this agreement.
The Author agrees to require that the publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Work authorized by the Author. If the publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Work, the publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
Each Author is responsible for all statements made in the Work. Each Author warrants that the Work:
- is his or her original work
- has not been previously published
- has been submitted only to Composition Studies
- does not contain any libelous or unlawful statements
- has gathered appropriate ethics approval (IRB) for the use of any material involving human subjects (this applies to student work and classroom-based research)